Page 14 - ijamd05570-1
P. 14

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                          Optimization of membrane shrinkage and stability


               Springer; 2009.                                 35.  Raychaudhuri S. Introduction to monte carlo simulation. In:
                                                                  Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference; 2008.
               doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2
                                                                  doi: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736059
            26.  Su X, Yan X, Tsai CL. Linear regression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev
               Comput Stat. 2012;4(3):275-294.                 36.  Kroese DP, Rubinstein RY. Monte carlo methods.  Wiley
                                                                  Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2012;4(1):48-58.
               doi: 10.1002/wics.1198
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/nano15020117
            27.  Mosca E, Szigeti F, Tragianni S, Gallagher D, Groh G.
               SHAP-based explanation methods: A  review for NLP   37.  Kroese DP, Brereton T, Taimre T, et al. Why the Monte Carlo
               interpretability. In:  Proceedings of the 29   International   method is so important today. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput
                                               th
               Conference on Computational Linguistics; 2022.     Stat. 2014;6(6):386-392.
               doi: 2022.coling-1.406                             doi: 10.1002/wics.1314
            28.  Antwarg L, Miller R M, Shapira B, Rokach L. Explaining   38.  Gao H, He W, Zhao YB, Opris DM, Xu G, Wang J. Electret
               anomalies detected by autoencoders using Shapley Additive   mechanisms  and  kinetics  of  electrospun  nanofiber
               Explanations. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;186:115736.   membranes and lifetime in filtration applications in
                                                                  comparison with corona charged membranes. J Membr Sci.
               doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115736
                                                                  2020;600:117879.
            29.  Van  den  Broeck  G,  Lykov  A,  Schleich  M,  Suciu  D.  On
               the  tractability of  SHAP explanations.  J  Artif Intell Res.      doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117879
               2022;74:851-886.                                39.  Tong  HW,  Wang  M.  Electrospinning  of  fibrous  polymer
                                                                  scaffolds using positive voltage or negative voltage:
               doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13283
                                                                  A comparative study. Biomed Mater. 2010;5(5):054110.
            30.  Li Z. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model
               using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and      doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/5/054110
               XGBoost. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2022;96:101845.  40.  Liao Y, Wang R, Tian M, Qiu C, Fane AG. Fabrication of
                                                                  polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber membranes by
               doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845
                                                                  electro spinning for direct contact membrane  distillation.
            31.  Zhang J, Ma X, Zhang J,  et al. Insights into geospatial   J Membr Sci. 2013;425:30-39.
               heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP
               XGBoost model. J Environ Manag. 2023;332:117357.     doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023
                                                               41.  Mi HY, Jing X, Jacques BR, Turng LS, Peng XF.
               doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357
                                                                  Characterization  and  properties  of  electrospun
            32.  Wang H, Liang Q, Hancock JT, Khoshgoftaar TM. Feature   thermoplastic polyurethane blend fibers: Effect of solution
               selection strategies: A comparative analysis of SHAP value   rheological properties on fiber formation.  J  Mater Res.
               and importance based methods. J Big Data. 2024;11(1):44.  2013;28(17):2339-2350.
               doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-00905-w                    doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023
            33.  Harrison RL. Introduction to monte carlo simulation. AIP   42.  Lem KW, Haw JR, Curran S, et al. Effect of hard segment
               Conf Proc. 2010;1204:17.                           molecular weight on dilute solution properties of ether based
               doi: 10.1063/1.3295638                             thermoplastic polyurethanes. Spectroscopy. 2013;1:11-18.
            34.  Metropolis N, Ulam S. The monte carlo method. J Am Stat      doi: 10.13189/nn.2013.01030
               Assoc. 1949;44(247):335-341.                    43.  Awad M, Khanna R. Support vector regression. In: Efficient
               doi: 10.2307/2280232                               Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for
                                                                  Engineers and System Designers. Springer; 2015.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9

















            Volume X Issue X (2025)                         14                        doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025260022
   9   10   11   12   13   14